Trump administration appoints 82 new immigration judges to expedite deportations

The Trump administration has appointed over 80 new immigration judges in a move to expedite deportation cases, marking the largest class in the Justice Department's history. The judges, primarily with backgrounds in ICE or military service, are part of an effort to reform the immigration court system amid a significant backlog of cases.

WTX News

4 min read
0

/

Trump administration appoints 82 new immigration judges to expedite deportations

Get you up to speed: Trump administration onboards 82 new immigration judges in bid to speed up deportation cases

The Trump administration recently swore in more than 80 new federal immigration judges in Washington, D.C., marking the largest class of immigration judges in the department’s history. This initiative aims to expedite deportation cases as part of a broader government crackdown on illegal immigration.

The Justice Department has appointed 153 permanent immigration judges for fiscal year 2026, which began in October 2025. Since January 2025, the backlog of pending immigration court cases has decreased from 4 million to approximately 3.5 million.

The Trump administration, through Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, reaffirmed its “commitment to reestablishing an immigration judge corps” under his leadership, citing efforts to restore order to the immigration system. In reaction, Greg Chen of the American Immigration Lawyers Association condemned the move, arguing that the “deportation judge” listings indicate a lack of impartiality, with judges being compelled to serve enforcement aims rather than act as independent adjudicators.

What remains unclear — It is not specified how many of the newly appointed immigration judges previously worked as ICE lawyers or prosecutors.

Trump administration appoints 82 new immigration judges to expedite deportations

The Trump administration this week onboarded more than 80 new federal immigration judges, in its latest push to expedite deportation cases and further its government-wide crackdown on illegal immigration, Justice Department officials said Thursday.

The Justice Department, which oversees the U.S. immigration court system, swore in 77 permanent immigration judges and 5 temporary immigration judges, a group that officials described as the largest class of immigration judges in the department’s history.

Immigration judges decide whether noncitizens the government is seeking to deport should be removed from the U.S. or allowed to stay. Despite their title, immigration judges are not part of the independent judicial branch and are instead employees of the Justice Department, which runs dozens of immigration courts across the U.S., as well as an appellate immigration court.

While they’re part of the executive branch, immigration judges are expected to be neutral, and not show bias towards noncitizens or the Immigration and Customs Enforcement lawyers seeking their deportation. Still, the Trump administration has publicly referred to them as “deportation judges” in official job listings, calling on potential applicants in one ad to “deliver justice” to “criminal illegal aliens.”

As part of its mass deportation campaign, Mr. Trump’s administration has sought to overhaul the country’s immigration courts, since, in many cases, immigrants have to be issued removal orders before being deported.

That overhaul has included a purge of more than 100 immigration judges, including many appointed under the Biden administration. Some of the judges ousted under the Trump administration have said they believe they were fired over not sufficiently pushing deportations or having backgrounds helping or advocating for immigrants.

Over the past year, the Justice Department has also issued directives and precedent-setting orders sharply restricting when immigration judges can grant asylum or other forms of relief to those facing deportation, and when they can release those in ICE detention on bond.

The new class of immigration judges was sworn in on Wednesday in Washington, D.C., Justice Department officials said.

Most of the immigration judges joining the Justice Department’s ranks this week had previously worked as ICE lawyers, prosecutors or in the military, as officers, judge advocates or other roles, according to bios provided by the department. Some worked as state or local judges, or as lawyers in private practice.

Justice Department officials said the administration has hired 153 permanent immigration judges in fiscal year 2026, which began in October 2025.

In a statement Thursday, Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche said the Trump administration is “committed to reestablishing an immigration judge corps that is dedicated to restoring the rule to the law in our nation’s immigration system.”

“This could only happen thanks to President Trump’s decisive leadership and commitment to securing our borders,” Blanche said.

Greg Chen, senior director for government relations at the American Immigration Lawyers Association, accused the Trump administration of seeking to “compel” immigration judges to “act as tools of enforcement, no impartial adjudicators.”

Chen said the “deportation judge” job listings show immigration courts “are not fair or independent in the way we expect them to be but are completely controlled by a President who has stripped them of power and is using them to execute his mass deportation campaign.”

Over the past years, the number of immigration court cases has ballooned, fueled by a surge in asylum requests by those crossing the southern border illegally. The backlog of millions of cases has crippled the government’s ability to decide many cases in a timely manner, leading to years-long waits for decisions.

On Thursday, Justice Department officials said they had reduced the backlog of pending immigration court cases from 4 million to around 3.5 million since January 2025.

Responses

    Sarah Mitchell·

    Great article! This really puts things into perspective. I appreciate the thorough research and balanced viewpoint.

    James Anderson·

    Interesting read, though I think there are some points that could have been explored further. Would love to see a follow-up on this topic.

    Emma Thompson·

    Thanks for sharing this! I had no idea about some of these details. Definitely bookmarking this for future reference.

    Michael Chen·

    Well written and informative. The examples provided really help illustrate the main points effectively.

    Olivia Rodriguez·

    This is exactly what I was looking for! Clear, concise, and very helpful. Keep up the excellent work!

Stay Updated

Get the latest posts delivered right to your inbox.

No spam, unsubscribe at any time.