Get you up to speed: Chilling blueprint that could start WWIII published by Russia – then removed | News World
A Russian political analyst, Alexander Nosovich, published a document advocating for a “lightning-fast” nuclear strike on Lithuania, which was later removed by RIA Novosti. The article’s withdrawal raised questions about its content, with RIA stating it did not align with the outlet’s position or the state policy of the Russian Federation.
RIA Novosti withdrew the article without providing an explanation, replacing it with a 404 error code shortly after its publication. Dmitry Kiselyov of Rossiya Segodnya categorised the incident as a “clear technical oversight.”
Following the removal of the article advocating a nuclear strike on Lithuania, RIA Novosti stated it “does not correspond with the editorial board’s position” and described the publication as a “clear technical oversight.” Dmitry Kiselyov, director-general of the state media group that includes RIA, emphasised that the outlet maintains its commitment to state policies amidst heightened tensions over NATO’s military presence in the region.
What remains unclear — The reason for the article’s removal by RIA Novosti, despite its previously stated alignment with Kremlin views, has not been explained.
Russian state media publishes, then removes article on nuclear strike plans against Lithuania
A Russian political analyst linked to the Kremlin wrote the chilling piece (Picture: e2w)
A chilling blueprint which outlined a ‘lightning-fast’ nuclear strike on Lithuania was published by Russian state media before being quickly removed.
Russian political analyst Alexander Nosovich, a well-connected member of Russian intelligence, wrote the document.
RIA Novosti, a Kremlin-aligned news organisation, released the report this week but quickly took it down without explanation.
Its abrupt withdrawal raises questions over whether it outlined a scenario that could be used by Moscow amid speculation that Putin is both close to deploying nuclear weapons and ready to attack a Western state to test NATO’s resolve.
Highlighting a supposedly quick war in Lithuania, Nosovich insisted: ‘Russia faces another special military operation. It will be very short.’
Nosovich penned the article before it was taken down (Picture: e2w)
Sign up for all of the latest stories
He highlighted a Lithuanian parliament’s decision to ‘lift the ban on the deployment of [NATO] nuclear weapons in the country’ before adding: ‘France and Britain are no longer hiding plans to station nuclear warheads close to Russia’s borders, and the decisions of Lithuanian politicians are tied to the far-reaching plans of Western Europeans.’
He dismissed Lithuania as ‘a suicidal country with no brains at all’ over the nuclear decision.
Lithuania shares a border with Russia’s heavily militarised Kaliningrad region and with Kremlin-ally Belarus.
Russia has nuclear-capable forces in Kaliningrad and says it has deployed nuclear weapons in Belarus.
Nosovich wrote: ‘It is not even a question of whether it would be long or short. Obviously it would be short: simply because of geography, a military conflict in the Baltic states could not be the same as the one in Ukraine.
‘The question is what means could be used. And since our opponents are the first to move the discussion into the realm of nuclear threats, Russia can even afford to dispense with sending in ground troops.
‘Only missiles with the appropriate warheads. A solution that would be not merely quick, but lightning-fast.’
He failed to mention that such an attack on Lithuania would in all likelihood trigger NATO’s Article 5 on mutual defence with dire consequences for Russia, so risking World War Three.
After the article was removed, a RIA.ru editorial statement said it was withdrawn and replaced initially with a 404 error code.
RIA said the article ‘does not correspond with the editorial board’s position, the outlet’s editorial policy or the state policy of the Russian Federation.’
Dmitry Kiselyov, director-general of Rossiya Segodnya, the Russian state media group that includes RIA Novosti, claimed the publication of the article was a ‘clear technical oversight.’
Comment now
Comments
Add WTX as a Preferred Source on Google
Great article! This really puts things into perspective. I appreciate the thorough research and balanced viewpoint.
Interesting read, though I think there are some points that could have been explored further. Would love to see a follow-up on this topic.
Thanks for sharing this! I had no idea about some of these details. Definitely bookmarking this for future reference.
Well written and informative. The examples provided really help illustrate the main points effectively.
This is exactly what I was looking for! Clear, concise, and very helpful. Keep up the excellent work!