Get you up to speed: Trump threatens severe actions against Iran amid rising tensions over oil demands
Donald Trump referred to potentially using nuclear weapons in a Truth Social post where he stated, “If they don’t make a deal and fast, I’m considering blowing everything up and taking over the oil.” Dr Simon A Bennett from the University of Leicester remarked that the likelihood of Trump using nuclear weapons is slim, explaining that such actions would contaminate Iran’s oil resources and infrastructure.
Dr Katayoun Shahandeh from SOAS, University of London, indicated that Trump’s remarks reflect his view that the entire Iranian population is “expendable,” though she doubts he would resort to nuclear weapons, stating, “So far, the pattern points to overwhelming conventional force rather than nuclear escalation.” Dr Simon A Bennett from the University of Leicester argued that Trump’s strategy suggests he would not use nuclear weapons, as such action would contaminate Iran’s oil resources, making them “dangerous, and possibly deadly.”
Dr Katayoun Shahandeh states that Trump’s threats towards Iran demonstrate his view that its entire population is “expendable”. Despite this, experts like Dr Simon A Bennett believe the likelihood of Trump using nuclear weapons is slim, as it would render Iran’s oil infrastructure dangerous and unviable for US oil companies.
Trump threatens an entire civilisation – how far can he go? | News World
Experts have cast doubt on suggestions that Trump could use nuclear weapons, even after mounting threats (Picture: Shutterstock)
Donald Trump’s increasingly incendiary commentary about Iran has prompted fears that he could go even further to get his demands.
In a Truth Social post earlier today, he wrote: ‘A whole civilisation will die tonight, never to be brought back again. But maybe something revolutionarily wonderful can happen, WHO KNOWS?’
His recent commentary shows that Trump sees the entirety of Iran – and its 90,000,000 residents – as ‘expendable’, Dr Katayoun Shahandeh, Lecturer and Senior Teaching Fellow at SOAS, University of London, told WTX.
Still, Dr Shahandeh doubts the President would opt for nuclear weapons to ‘wipe out a civilisation’, as Trump warned earlier today.
‘He is now threatening a civilisation that is thousands of years old and not just the 47-year-old Islamic regime,’ Dr Shahandeh said.
‘This civilisation has withstood the attacks from the 4th century BCE, with the Macedonian conquest of Persia and the burning of Persepolis, to the Arab conquest, the Mongol invasions, the Anglo-Soviet invasion of 1941 and the Iraqi invasion of 1980, and yet it has endured!’
Sign up for all of the latest stories
Strikes in the war so far have hit schools, universities, hospitals, housing and civilian infrastructure, with UNHCR reporting that millions have been displaced. All of this matters when assessing just how far Trump would go, Dr Shahandeh argues.
‘So far, the pattern points to overwhelming conventional force rather than nuclear escalation. At the same time, the fact that reports speak of iodine tablets being distributed, particularly to children, shows how deeply the fear of nuclear escalation has penetrated everyday life.’
Dr Simon A Bennett, of the University of Leicester, told WTX the chance of Trump using nuclear weapons is slim, even with his apocalyptic post.
In his Truth Social post, Trump wrote: ‘If they don’t make a deal and fast, I’m considering blowing everything up and taking over the oil.’
Dr Bennett argues: ‘Actually, in saying this, Trump is confirming he will not use nuclear weapons.
‘If he uses nuclear weapons, he will irradiate Iran’s critical national infrastructure and territory to the point where it would be dangerous, and possibly deadly, to go in after the oil.
‘If it’s Iran’s oil he wants, the last thing he will do is contaminate the country with radioactive fallout. The contamination will last for decades. No US oil company would agree to operate in such a dangerous environment.’
Could Trump actually be considering nuclear weapons?
Last summer, the US claimed to take out Iran’s nuclear capabilities (Picture: AFP)
Julian Borger wrote in the Guardian today: ‘The extremity of Trump’s threats, coupled with his growing desperation to find a way out of the conflict, has increased fears that a volatile president could try to use a nuclear weapon.’
Jeffrey Lewis, a nuclear weapons expert and professor at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey, told the Guardian that although Trump previously showed restraint with nuclear weapons, he was now more unsure.
‘I don’t know how strong that respect is when he is losing the war and his mind at the same time.’
Last summer, Trump vowed to unleash ‘the most powerful and lethal weapons ever built’ if Russia were to supply nuclear warheads to Iran.
Trump has repeatedly said that the aim in Iran is to destroy the country’s nuclear facilities and spark ‘regime change’.
Today might be a turning point in the history of the region.
Comment now
Comments
Add WTX as a Preferred Source on Google
Great article! This really puts things into perspective. I appreciate the thorough research and balanced viewpoint.
Interesting read, though I think there are some points that could have been explored further. Would love to see a follow-up on this topic.
Thanks for sharing this! I had no idea about some of these details. Definitely bookmarking this for future reference.
Well written and informative. The examples provided really help illustrate the main points effectively.
This is exactly what I was looking for! Clear, concise, and very helpful. Keep up the excellent work!